Recently, there was
a "debate" among evangelicals over the issue of the national debt mentioned
in a USA Today (February 17, 2011) article. I was quoted in it.
In fact, a television
segment we produced at Coral Ridge Ministries-TV—on how Americans are concerned
about the national debt and that this is a moral issue—helped sparked that
debate.
"’The Bible is very clear
about the moral dangers of debt,’" a conservative Christian broadcaster
tells Daniel Burke of Religion News Service." So begins the article. I
cannot tell a lie—they were quoting me.
We are very concerned about
the national debt, and it truly is a moral issue.
The good book says
the borrower is a slave to the lender.
It also says that, as much
as is possible, we should try to avoid debt—except the debt to love one
another.
Furthermore, it notes
that a good man leaves an inheritance for his children.
But today in America,
we’re leaving a pile of debt for our children. How is that good?
Author Bill Federer
was a guest on our TV segment on the immorality of the national debt, and
he made the observation that "our founders were willing to sacrifice their
prosperity for their posterity. They pledged their lives and their fortunes
and their sacred honor for their posterity. Today, we’re sacrificing our
posterity for prosperity and saddling our kids with an unpayable debt,
so we can maintain our standard of living."
Ouch.
What kind of a country
runs up a big bill, spends the money now, and then leaves it up to our
children and grandchildren to have to pay it all back? That seems very
unethical to me.
I spoke recently about
this issue with a couple of US representatives.
Michele Bachmann of Minnesota
told me: "The national debt is a moral issue, because it is affecting every
man, woman, and child in this country. We’re at a very dangerous point
now with the escalation of debt in our country. We’ve never before seen
this level of debt. Today, the average American owes $200,000 on the national
debt."
Mike Pence of Indiana said,
"We have to make sacrifices that affect us today and put us on a long term
pathway of fiscal solvency, rather than enjoying the blessings of prosperity
today, but bequeathing to our children and grandchildren the obligations
to figure out how to pay for it."
When you look at the
debate going on in Wisconsin right now with all the bused- in federal union
workers and the teachers, some of whom are receiving faked doctor’s excused
absences, unpayable debt is at the heart of the issue. The governor is
trying to reign runaway government spending, and he’s running into fierce
opposition from the government unions.
The recent riots in
Greece dealt with the same issue. The overdue bills came due.
A government can’t
keep spending money it doesn’t have.
There are really three
main alternatives: cut spending, increase revenue, or steal from the people
by printing up more money.
That latter option
is stealing from the people because it causes inflation. Those on fixed
incomes, such as retirees, lose a portion of their spending power. Maybe
some old people really will resort to eating dog food if the government
keeps spending recklessly.
Here’s the bottom
line: it’s the people’s money. Every penny the government has comes from
the people. Somehow these politicians think that government money comes
from some other source.
The fact is, we all
have to live within our means. Why should the government be any different?
Liberals will say
we need to do more to help the poor. I agree…on a voluntary basis. And
I do my part. But the government doesn’t help the poor well—it only makes
more of them, for example, by subsidizing illegitimacy.
Could it be that such government
programs are essentially trying to buy votes? George Bernard Shaw once
said, If you rob Peter to pay Paul, you can always count on Paul’s vote.
Hopefully, we will get this
runaway government spending under control before we bankrupt the nation—and
leave our children stuck with the bill.
###