July 22, 2011 is a
day of infamy for Norwegians. Not since World War II has that small, peace-loving
country of five million experienced so much tragedy.
First, there was the
bombing of the offices of their parliament members (with the chief target
being ostensibly the prime minister) in Oslo, and then there was the systematic
shooting of children in a summer camp on a nearby island. The number of
dead was at least 76, with many wounded.
I know Norway well
and have been there eight times because my wife is from there, and we were
married there.
Initially, the attack
had all the earmarks of an Islamic assault. In fact, someone from the global
jihadist movement claimed “credit” for the attack. But now it seems to
be the work of a home-grown terrorist---32 year old Anders Behring Breivik.
The mainstream media was
calling him a “fundamentalist Christian.” But his own 1500-page manifesto
doesn’t line up with that (nor do his actions line up with any element
of Christian teaching). He’s a Darwinist, not a creationist, perhaps an
Odin-worshiper, not a Christ-worshiper. He claims he opposes the spread
of Islam in Europe (which is a serious problem), and to prove his point
he shoots a bunch of European children (future, potential leaders of the
Norwegian Labor Party).
Breivik noted, "Regarding
my personal relationship with God, I guess I'm not an excessively religious
man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter
of a monocultural Christian Europe."
If you had to label him,
he would probably be best to be called a neo-Darwinian crusader. But a
good crusader is a bad Christian (while a good jihadist is a good Muslim).
I heard Michael Savage say
on the radio the other day that the shooter was a Christian and had quoted
Bible verses. I looked through much of the manifesto and didn’t find any
Bible verses. Nor do I expect to.
Dr. Arne Fleldstad, my Norwegian
brother-in-law, a former editor with the newspaper, Aftenposten, captured
well the essence of Breivik’s document: “The 1500+ page manifesto tells
of a young man with fantasies of knights and crusades to defend what he
considers the true European culture. Mr. Breivik also belongs to the Free
Masons (first grade) and describes himself as a Justiciar Knight in his
new movement, which he claims is international---and which borrows from
old Norse religion.”
Perhaps there’s a link between
such fantasies and the fact that when Breivik was very young (about one
year’s old), the father abandoned the family.
Breivik’s thinking is influenced
far more by Nietzsche (and indirectly Hitler) than any Christian sources.
The 19th century atheistic German philosopher bemoaned the fact that in
Europe, because of Judeo-Christian influence, the weak are treated better
than they deserve.
Breivik says we should be
listening to Nietzsche when he decries the Christian tradition for this
sad state of affairs---whereby (in Breivik’s own words) “the weak, the
poor, the meek, the oppressed and the wretched are virtuous and blessed
by God whereas the strong, the wealthy, the noble and the powerful are
the immoral and damned by the vengeful almighty Yahweh for eternity.” In
short, we should favor survival of the fittest, not empathy for the underdog.
In his book, The AntiChrist,
Nietzsche (the man who coined the phrase “God is dead”) delivers a blistering
attack against Christianity, not for being too cruel, but for being too
nice to people who don’t deserve it. Who does he hold up as heroes? A “herd
of blond beasts of prey, a race of conquerors and masters.”
Sounds like Breivik---a
“blond beast of prey.”
The media totally missed
the mark by labeling Breivik as a “Christian.”
He didn’t go to church.
He was more of a worshiper of the old Norwegian gods. He said he believed
in “Christian culture”---but not in Jesus per se.
He put it this way in his
manifesto: “If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God
then you are a religious Christian. Myself and many more like me do not
necessarily have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God. We
do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social, identity and
moral platform. This makes us Christian (p. 1307).”
No, it doesn’t. Being a
Christian means trusting in Jesus Christ and His finished work on the Cross
for the forgiveness of sins. It means repenting from those sins and seeking
to please Him by living a life of love. Jesus said we should love our neighbor
as ourselves, and He said we should even love our enemies. Not hunt them
down like rabbits.
But as my Norwegian wife
points out: Don’t look for logic in evil.
In his manifesto, Breivik
says a crusader-type knight to join his movement “must be a Christian,
Christian agnostic, or a Christian atheist.” A Christian agnostic? A Christian
atheist? These are oxymorons.
He also says, “I have studied
Norse mythology and have a lot of respect for the Odiinist traditions…Odinism
is still and will always be an important part of my culture and identity.”
Odin was one of the main, violent gods worshiped by the Vikings.
One other point: Norway
used to send out “blond beasts of prey” in the Vikings who were the scourge
of Europe, until Christianity slowly began to change the people there about
a thousand years ago. The Vikings used drugs (from mushrooms) and go on
berserk killing rampages. Breivik’s lawyer said he was drugged up when
he carried out his killing spree, as he listened to heart-pumping music
from a Lord of the Rings movie soundtrack on his i-Pod to numb his seared
conscience, while shooting child after child.
In short, while the mainstream
media wants to call Anders Behring Breivik a “fundamentalist Christian,”
it’s much more accurate to think of him instead as a neo-Darwinist and
neo-Viking.
My wife’s family and
friends there say that God has already brought some good out of this tragedy,
in the solidarity and Christian love being shown by the Norwegian people
to help bind up the wounds and ease the national grief. Our thoughts
and prayers are with them.
###